Does the State of Missouri have the authority under the Constitution of the United States to charge, try, and convict the petitioner of first-degree robbery, first-degree assault, and two counts of armed criminal action

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Does the State of Missourl have the authority under The Constitution OF The United States to Charge, try and convict by a Jury Patitloner OF, First degree robbery ; First degree assault and two Counts of armed criminal actor pe Missour! haw GSectlons 5%. 020 ; 565,050 and 571. 018+) And In 80 doing fail to disclose exculpatory and npeoching evidence neultycliseo verd. (One) U.S. Department of Justice /F.BI. documents adisclse upon request about Andy Todd Wagoner who under oath claim he was train by the F.b.L in advanced fingepting fdentification 7 fact 1s not true. Andy Todd Wagoner was the State. of Missour’s expert witness in petitioner case. (two) Southbast Missoun’ Crime Lab (SEMO) Crime Lab returned Andy todd Wagoner training andl carrie law Vitae _— prior to the. Job merging with the Missour’ State. Meghurgy Patrol. ao From 1986 “2003 “his personnel File wes fater given 40 his tamify atter he died sn fold, (Ihre2) The. femiscot County Prosecutors Office withheld exculpatory and impeaching evidence. ofa newly discover of an. Pemiscot County Sherifl’s Departmend (AB-~243) Radto Logldted May 14, (907 the clog alter the robbery showing +wo other males looking for the manes{Frort the robber. The Question(s) Presented are, does the State of Mssourt have te authority to deptive pettioner ot his Iberty under The Constitution Of The United States, The fourteeath Amntadm eit, Section by And overrale, Brady v.Marylond, 313 US. 63,83 Sct 194,/0 d+ éd, AW LIS (1963)i Napuev, LWinots, 360 U.S. 20% 79 8.64. 073. L kal Ld thl7 (1959); andl | Ariz.v Youngblood, 486 US. $1. — | 11, ,