No. 19-8919

Scott Clevenger v. Shawn Phillips, Warden

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-07-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure custodial-interrogation evidence-suppression miranda-rights right-to-counsel self-incrimination suppression-of-evidence
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Petitioner's self-incriminating statements that was given while he was in custodial interigation without him first being notified of his Miranda rights, violated his right to counsel, against self-incrimination, and should have been suppressed at trial?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether Petitioner's self-incriminating statements that was given while he was in custodial interigation without him first being notified of his Miranda rights, violated his right to counsel, , against self-incrimination, and should have been suppressed at trial? i. ' . . TABLE OF CONTENT Question Presented. ccc eece sce e eee e eee e tees eens cess eceeceese Lie Table of AUtHOLities. ccc cece cece cece cece ene eeneetesecececesene bid (0) 0 5 oo) 5 ar (Jurisdiction... cece cc ccc cece eee eee eee eee eee eet

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-13
Waiver of right of respondent Warden Phillips to respond filed.
2020-06-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 7, 2020)

Attorneys

Scott Clevenger
Scott Clevenger — Petitioner
Scott Clevenger — Petitioner
Warden Phillips
Michael M. Stahl — Respondent
Michael M. Stahl — Respondent