No. 19-8929
Tedarel Leshun Preston v. United States
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: armed-career-criminal-act criminal-law criminal-offense elements-clause mens-rea reckless-mens-rea statutory-interpretation violent-felony
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-10-30
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a criminal offense with a reckless mens rea qualifies as a 'violent felony' under the elements clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW L Whether a criminal offense with a reckless mens rea qualifies as a “violent felony” under the elements clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)Q). i INTERESTED PARTIES There are no
Docket Entries
2020-11-02
Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-10-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.
2020-10-09
Reply of petitioner Tedarel Preston submitted.
2020-09-29
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2020-08-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 29, 2020.
2020-08-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 31, 2020 to September 29, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-07-30
Response Requested. (Due August 31, 2020)
2020-07-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-06-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 7, 2020)
Attorneys
Tedarel Preston
Bonnie Williams — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Bonnie Williams — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent