Whether the U.S. Supreme Court should review the discretion of the U.S. District Court and the U.S. Court of Appeals in dismissing the petitioner's claims against Arkansas prison officials

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Oia The 0.5. Vetete Court Aowse Ths Diseretton by Vering Me-the Vetronee Aggarat ment OF Counce! ? Wed the WG. Mestrick Comet ere and Violets the 5. Loncattution by diseaisst — ng hy Ligath Amendwrert Vislation Claims against The tedpondestt ~ Kf — ical Wendy Kelley, Movahall Reed and Neremny Andrews 9 Vid Lhe US.howet Apgeals-Bf Cie deny me-the Reftionee duskics by Cantiyer int, wit toe Weds Vetere wen drsrnr$sil q Wa Loe OS. Viste Court eve ond vtolote the Ud. Coneditatten b Eierting toy BM Araendenent Viclottoen] Patlove to pretect Clatea’ ny — othed Xe respondent OFF i crals Kaathry hoatter, orn Leow toed Ste ¢h — tn Lone, Dovid Knott and dares Yytud 9 . oo And aid Yer U8. tort OF Angels — Hh (Se, deny me-the. Retitionee, ad — wstice oy Lancotting vw) AW Krstin NNN My Unkend ? \ os & mais carviagge of Sosktee committed \n, WS. Dist, Court dodge — 5 and aggelhacte Court dudges when They gtoted tespondents Qual — ‘f ‘ed Leamueitly Ry t : Questions | , ~ ry . A . = I \wlos iA Sproneons sor Woe Wed Cour OF Aaoeols ke ak fice Moe — Noo ‘Uk erroneous Ror Hoe Wed. Couck OF Appeals ho ofRiren Khe VS. | idteketok Court's decision Xo alanis Worden Seremy Andrew, Vic — | Lor dendy Kelley axed Veg Ni at Noxrdno\t h Ad LQNOE ANE ho ) 4 Mr. Andvers Meoskelley ond MeRerd Me Cons— XP onal Vials ky Soe Rathore to Orokeck me—Vonalan Res also ; a ray 6 8 LY | whe Ye ds onoslless Dower & Crowtords lone &Knakts they knwe fost Arkansas Regional Prisan’s recreation Nord operation Or mal A byt § Xi AN Ayal 1 O& DUOSKOKT10. Mek OF Serioos how Ko me I Nat 4 io me, Orin ken Xo A Y Sa Tea uate, — awker_atwotes b ore. nad Kook a0 ume, x a6 dni \ —_ NSON 10 Ouvrd NO abe Xk, O50, Mos. Kelley, Mee Reed ood toe TiAndeews Sotedsee Seakeek woenorkes $ ‘. \ Rae hoods 8 rvX\ IN iN ne Lomakest, Yes Kelles Me heed One Mo. Anders aawed Del | _ A \ 4 4 4 — OXE wid xa o Ae der idus od ACESDI MOKS Wo ANE tala de ond Sake y CR romakes aX took AL. Redoaal sion ny Railing Ike adequaxely Suoervise Gad Xan Nee Seroon’s OK kieees which \a— —_[eudess ‘ape o— Vans, Knott, Lone, Crow ford ond Oavter ‘in bow | mat t ‘au ann Onid WOore, Gondetan Condi tons Ond far ine eo develo and, ow t ia (10, pene \— ix ality Vishations, dnd alse thy Railing Ko dlecteline, malfeasont \ ffs —= Re Noe 0.5. BH Che Court ME Aggeals bee loy Lrocurring with Kat Soke Courts decision Xo Oran Summary Jodoment Xe dn— lellets Nix. Quen, Nive. anett, Ne Lone, Ades Croudtard ond Mo. — i xhe bee boat aa seal EXT ON Canentr ia with Mae. _ Miskriet Court’s decision Th ocant onalified text Xo cope — fies Dyeus, hnatt Vase, coated and bakes ? | — > [Did aooellets elie ad, Aadsi, yesh sac oad | foots Violate, the SY Amendment Te the U.Se Conetitutton® [LA Ast OF Alt The A pecltss-Defindant sn [Arkansas Yeisen O&iciclsiVirector Wendy Kelley! Deputy Vireetar _ [Marshall Reeds Worden deremy Andeewas Qsauty Warden dam— Reo yeu Matar Gasid Knotts Cogtoin StedrenLanes \furtenant Soot — [a GromPordsond Secaeout Kathy borers | Cased DbrOeoud, : | ; | . To |