No. 19-896
Tae D. Johnson, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, et al. v. Antonio Arteaga-Martinez
Relisted (3)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: administrative-law bond-hearing clear-and-convincing-evidence due-process flight-risk immigration-detention immigration-law statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Immigration
HabeasCorpus Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-07-01
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether an alien who is detained under 8 U.S.C. 1231 is entitled by statute, after six months of detention, to a bond hearing at which the government must prove to an immigration judge by clear and convincing evidence that the alien is a flight risk or a danger to the community
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether an alien who is detained under 8 U.S.C. 1231 is entitled by statute, after six months of detention, to a bond hearing at which the government must prove to an immigration judge by clear and convincing evidence that the alien is a flight risk or a danger to the community. (D)
Docket Entries
2022-07-15
JUDGMENT ISSUED
2022-06-13
Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Sotomayor, J., delivered the <a href = 'https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-896_2135.pdf'>opinion</a> of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas, Alito, Kagan, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Gorsuch, J., joined as to Part I. Breyer, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.
2022-01-11
Argued. For petitioners: Austin Raynor, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Pratik A. Shah, Washington, D. C.
2021-12-22
Reply of petitioners Tae D. Johnson, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2021-12-08
CIRCULATED
2021-11-30
The record from the U.S.C.A. 3rd Circuit and for the U.S.D.C. Middle District of Pennsylvania (Harrisburg) has been electronically filed.
2021-11-22
Brief of respondent Antonio Arteaga-Martinez filed.
2021-11-17
Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 3rd Circuit.
2021-11-17
ARGUMENT SET FOR Tuesday, January 11, 2022.
2021-10-18
Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioners GRANTED.
2021-10-14
Brief of petitioners Tae D. Johnson, et al. filed.
2021-10-06
Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner Tae D. Johnson, et al.
2021-10-01
Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including October 14, 2021. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including November 22, 2021.
2021-09-28
Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.
2021-08-23
As Rule 34.6 provides, “If the Court schedules briefing and oral argument in a case that was governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c) or Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 49.1(c), the parties shall submit electronic versions of all prior and subsequent filings with this Court in the case, subject to [applicable] redaction rules.” Subsequent party and amicus filings in the case should now be submitted through the Court’s electronic filing system, with any necessary redactions.
2021-08-23
Petition GRANTED.
2021-07-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2021.
2020-06-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2020.
2020-05-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.
2020-05-14
Reply of petitioners Matthew T. Albence, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2020-05-08
Motion to delay distribution of the petition for a writ certiorari until May 19, 2020, granted.
2020-05-08
Motion of petitioner to delay distribution of the petition for a writ of certiorari under Rule 15.5 from May 12, 2020 to May 19, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-04-22
Brief of respondent Antonio Arteaga-Martinez in opposition filed.
2020-03-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 22, 2020.
2020-03-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 23, 2020 to April 22, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-02-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 23, 2020.
2020-02-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 20, 2020 to March 23, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-01-17
Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and shouild not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.
2020-01-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 20, 2020)
2019-12-10
Application (19A515) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until January 17, 2020.
2019-12-06
Application (19A515) to extend further the time from December 18, 2019 to January 17, 2020, submitted to Justice Alito.
2019-11-12
Application (19A515) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until December 18, 2019.
2019-11-08
Application (19A515) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 18, 2019 to December 18, 2019, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
Antonio Arteaga-Martinez
Pratik A. Shah — Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP, Respondent
Pratik A. Shah — Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP, Respondent
Asian-Americans Advancing Justice-Asian Law Caucus, et al
Constitutional Accountability Center
Former Immigration Judges and Board of Immigration Appeals Members
Tae D. Johnson, et al.
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Petitioner
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Petitioner