No. 19-90

Lexington H-L Services, Inc., dba Lexington Herald Leader v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-07-17
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (2)Response Waived
Tags: civil-rights driveway-delivery first-amendment free-press free-speech municipal-ordinance news-distribution print-news time-place-manner time-place-manner-restriction
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a municipal ordinance flatly prohibiting driveway delivery of a community newspaper but specifying alternative methods of hand delivery represents a reasonable regulation of the time, place, and manner of delivery consistent with the First Amendment

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED The Community News is a free community newsweekly that has been distributed to homes in the Lexington, Kentucky area for several years by a traditional method of newspaper delivery, “driveway delivery,” by which news carriers throw the paper onto the driveways or yards of area homes. Residents who do not wish to receive The Community News, however, are able to opt out of delivery. In 2017, the Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government (“the County”) enacted an Ordinance prohibiting driveway delivery of The Community News; instead, the County requires delivery of “unsolicited” materials, including the weekly newspaper, to one of six specified locations at each residence. Pet. App. 29a. The nature of the permitted delivery locations effectively requires the newspaper to be distributed by hand delivery. The restrictions imposed by the County and approved by the decisions below place the constitutionally protected distribution of news and information in serious jeopardy. The Sixth Circuit’s approval of the Ordinance as a reasonable time, place, and manner restriction cannot be squared with the First Amendment, a longstanding body of this Court’s jurisprudence applying free speech and free press protections to the distribution of news and information, and the substantial weight of authority in state and federal courts that have considered the issue. See Martin v. City of Struthers, 319 U.S. 141 (1948) (holding that the First Amendment protects the direct distribution of written information to homeowners). The conflict of authority created by the decision below and the lingering uncertainty regarding the reasonable limits on time, place, and ii manner regulations of news delivery call for this Court’s guidance—a need that is particularly acute in today’s fast-changing print news marketplace. Accordingly, the Petition presents the following question: Whether a municipal ordinance flatly prohibiting driveway delivery of a community newspaper but specifying alternative methods of hand delivery represents a reasonable regulation of the time, place, and manner of delivery consistent with the First Amendment.

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by CNHI, LLC, et al. GRANTED.
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-16
Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by CNHI, LLC, et al.
2019-08-07
Waiver of right of respondent Lexington - Fayette Urban County Gov't to respond filed.
2019-07-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 16, 2019)

Attorneys

CNHI, LLC, et al.
Kurt WimmerCovington & Burling, Amicus
Lexington - Fayette Urban County Gov't
Keith MoormanFrost Brown Todd, LLC, Respondent
Lexington H-L Services, Inc. d/b/a Lexington Herald Leader
John A. Bussian IIIThe Bussian Law Firm, PLLC, Petitioner