Does Exhibit F. The Hill School Conversations sufficiently represent the facts supporting civil-conspiracy,defamation

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. The questions posed in the course of appellate actions at FD-07-000190 were made cognizable by stipulation of all represented parties.! Each question should be regarded as if entered here in its entirety.2 2. Does Exhibit F. The Hill School Converstations sufficiently represent the facts supporting civil conspiracy and 42 Pa. C.S. §8344 Defamation?3 8. Would those claims of civil conspiracy or defamation be irreparably lost per Pa.R.A.P. §313(b) Collateral Orders if this appeal is not heard?4 4, Would the underlying criminal complaints or data about my beloved nifias perdidas be irreparably lost if this appeal is not heard? 5. Was that the intention of the trial court? 6. Would this perverse outcome further erode Pa. Constitution Article 1§11 or U.S. Constitution Article IV§1? ; : q. Why didn’t the Hon. David Wecht participate in this decision? 8. Do either 18 U.S.C. §1846 or U.S.C. §1961 provide remedy for the problem of Thrasymachus? Does the #NewOrganon? , 9. Could all of this damage be mitigated by ordering the trial court to hear 04-25-19 Amended Complaint?5 1 See attached Exhibit G. Items of Judicial Notice or 2 See attached Exhibit H. Questions or Aporia or ° 3 See attached or 4 For definitions of civil conspiracy see: Weaver v. Franklin County, 918 A.2d 194, 202 (Pa.Cmwlth. 2007), and Reading Radio, Inc. v. Fink, 833 A.2d 199, 212 (Pa.Super. 2003). 5 See attached Exhibits E-F or download directly at 38953832/04-25-19 Amended_Complaint ii LISTS OF PARTIES AND