No. 19-906
Philip N. Antico v. United States
Tags: allen-charge circuit-court-conflict constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fundamental-due-process fundamental-rights jury-instruction jury-instructions retrial-cost retrial-costs
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-05-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is a criminal defendant's fundamental constitutional rights violated by an Allen charge that instructs a deadlocked jury to consider the expense of a retrial?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED The Eleventh Circuit’s Allen charge is the only pattern jury instruction in all Federal Circuit Courts that directly references the cost of a retrial. The question presented is: Is a criminal defendant’s fundamental constitutional rights violated by an Allen charge that instructs a deadlocked jury to consider the expense of a retrial?
Docket Entries
2020-06-01
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.
2020-04-24
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2020-04-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 24, 2020.
2020-04-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 22, 2020 to April 24, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-03-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 22, 2020.
2020-03-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 23, 2020 to April 22, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-02-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 23, 2020.
2020-02-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 21, 2020 to March 23, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-01-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 21, 2020)
Attorneys
Philip Antico
Nicole Nicolette Mace — The Law Offices of Curt Sanchez, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent