Whether the Sixth Circuit erred in its analysis of the right-to-marry for same-sex couples

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The Questions Presented for this Court’s review are: 1. Whether the Sixth Circuit erred when, citing Obergefell v. Hodges, it created a special standard for a same-sex couple’s claimed temporary burden on the constitutional right to marry, and thereby refused to apply this Court’s tiered “direct and substantial burden” analysis in Zablocki v. Redhail regarding right-to-marry cases for differentsex couples. 2. Whether the Sixth Circuit erred by refusing to follow this Court’s repeated instruction “not to define clearly established law at a high level of generality,” Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, and thereby rejecting a county clerk’s qualified immunity claim for temporarily suspending all marriage licenses bearing her name and authority in only one of 120 Kentucky counties in the immediate aftermath of Obergefell, while Kentucky’ comprehensive marriage laws and forms that govern every duty of the clerk were being re-written, and while seeking a successful accommodation for her sincerely held religious beliefs.