No. 19-931
Jay Lawrence Friedheim v. Dane Field
Tags: admiralty-law attorney-fees bankruptcy civil-procedure jones-act maintenance-and-cure maritime-law seaman-contract
Key Terms:
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-03-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a seaman's wage contract that includes maintenance and cure entitles the prevailing party to attorney's fees
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether a seaman’s wage contract that includes maintenance and cure entitles the prevailing party to attorney’s fees under Alyeska Pipeline Serv. Co. v. Wilderness Society, 421 U.S. 240, 257 (1975)? 2. Whether attorney’s fees may be awarded for attempting to collect maintenance and cure from a bankrupt vessel owner and the seaman’s bankrupt employer under Vaughan v. Atkinson, 369 U.S. 527 (1962)?
Docket Entries
2020-03-30
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/27/2020.
2020-01-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 24, 2020)
Attorneys
Jay Friedheim
Jay Lawrence Friedheim — Admiralty Advocates, Petitioner
Jay Lawrence Friedheim — Admiralty Advocates, Petitioner