No. 19-965
Kenin L. Edwards v. Michael L. Atterberry, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-law appeal conviction criminal-jurisdiction due-process illinois-supreme-court jurisdictional-challenge sentencing
Latest Conference:
2020-02-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether it is a violation of due process for the Illinois Supreme Court, after being fully advised in the premises, to abstain from addressing whether the trial court has criminal jurisdiction over Petitioner, thereby forcing Petitioner to proceed to a sentencing hearing and potential conviction and appeal in the absence of criminal jurisdiction.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether it is a violation of due process for the Illinois Supreme Court to abstain from addressing criminal jurisdiction over Petitioner
Docket Entries
2020-03-02
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2020.
2020-02-04
Waiver of right of respondents Michael Atterberry, et al. to respond filed.
2020-01-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 4, 2020)
Attorneys
Kenin Edwards
Robert James Hanauer — Hanauer Law Office, LLC, Petitioner
Michael Atterberry, et al.
Michael Marc Glick — Respondent