No. 19-965
Kenin L. Edwards v. Michael L. Atterberry, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-law appeal conviction criminal-jurisdiction due-process illinois-supreme-court jurisdictional-challenge sentencing
Key Terms:
ERISA DueProcess HabeasCorpus
ERISA DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-02-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether it is a violation of due process for the Illinois Supreme Court to abstain from addressing criminal jurisdiction over Petitioner
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED The question presented is: 1. Whether it is a violation of due process for the IIlinois Supreme Court, after being fully advised in the premises, to abstain from addressing whether the trial court has criminal jurisdiction over Petitioner, thereby forcing Petitioner to proceed to a sentencing hearing and potential conviction and appeal in the absence of criminal jurisdiction.
Docket Entries
2020-03-02
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2020.
2020-02-04
Waiver of right of respondents Michael Atterberry, et al. to respond filed.
2020-01-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 4, 2020)
Attorneys
Kenin Edwards
Robert James Hanauer — Hanauer Law Office, LLC, Petitioner
Robert James Hanauer — Hanauer Law Office, LLC, Petitioner