No. 19-992

Greg Skipper, Warden v. Curtis Jerome Byrd

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-02-07
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (1) Experienced Counsel
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure effective-assistance-of-counsel fair-trial hypothetical-plea-offer lafler-v-cooper plea-bargaining sixth-amendment trial-rights
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2020-05-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel include the right to a plea offer that was never made?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED In Lafler v. Cooper, 566 U.S. 156 (2012), the Court held that a defendant has the right to effective assistance of counsel in considering whether to accept a plea offer—even if the defendant was later convicted after a fair trial. The Lafler Court cautioned, however, that this right exists only “[i]f a plea bargain has been offered .Ifno plea offer is made, . . . the issue raised here simply does not arise.” Jd. at 168 (emphasis added). The Sixth Circuit, with one judge strongly dissenting, nonetheless held here that the prisoner, who was convicted after a fair trial, was denied his Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel because his counsel failed to pursue plea negotiations— that is, where no “plea offer [was] made.” Id. The court declined to explain how the state courts, in remedying this purported constitutional violation, could determine what hypothetical plea offer he would have received and whether a state court would have accepted the hypothetical plea offer. The question presented is: Does the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel include the right to a plea offer that was never made?

Docket Entries

2020-05-26
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.
2020-04-30
Reply of petitioner Greg Skipper, Warden filed. (Distributed)
2020-04-20
Motion to delay distribution of the petition for a writ certiorari until May 5, 2020, granted.
2020-04-17
Motion of petitioner to delay distribution of the petition for a writ of certiorari under Rule 15.5 from April 22, 2020 to May 5, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-04-07
Brief of respondent Curtis Jerome Byrd in opposition filed.
2020-03-05
Brief amici curiae of States of Ohio, et al. filed.
2020-02-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 8, 2020.
2020-02-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 9, 2020 to April 8, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-02-17
Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Curtis Jerome Byrd.
2020-02-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 9, 2020)
2019-12-18
Application (19A689) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 6, 2020 to February 5, 2020, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
2019-12-18
Application (19A689) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until February 5, 2020.

Attorneys

Curtis Jerome Byrd
Elizabeth L. Jacobs — Respondent
Elizabeth L. Jacobs — Respondent
Greg Skipper, Warden
Fadwa A. HammoudMichigan Department of Attorney General, Petitioner
Fadwa A. HammoudMichigan Department of Attorney General, Petitioner
States of Ohio, Alaska, Arizona, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia
Benjamin Michael FlowersOhio Attorney General Dave Yost, Amicus
Benjamin Michael FlowersOhio Attorney General Dave Yost, Amicus