No. 20-100
Michael S. Barth v. Bernards Township Planning Board, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: constitutional-process constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection injunction new-jersey-supreme-court procedural-fairness remand supreme-court-review temporary-injunction
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-12-11
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the unconstitutional process of the court below should result in a temporary injunction and or remand back to the New Jersey Supreme Court to ensure United States Constitutional Due Process and Equal Protection is followed?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED : While there are a number of questions and subquestions in this matter, the overarching question is whether the unconstitutional process of the court below should result in a temporary injunction and or remand back to the New Jersey Supreme Court to ensure United States Constitutional Due Process and Equal Protection is followed?
Docket Entries
2020-12-14
Rehearing DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-11-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/11/2020.
2020-10-30
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-10-13
Petition DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-09-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
2020-08-24
Waiver of right of respondents Bernards Township Planning Board and Bernard Township to respond filed.
2020-08-06
Waiver of right of respondent Islamic Society of Basking Ridge, Inc. to respond filed.
2020-07-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 31, 2020)
Attorneys
Bernards Township Planning Board and Bernard Township
Brent R. Pohlman — Methfessel & Werbel, P.C., Respondent
Brent R. Pohlman — Methfessel & Werbel, P.C., Respondent
Islamic Society of Basking Ridge, Inc.
Robert L. Toll — Hogan Lovells US, LLP, Respondent
Robert L. Toll — Hogan Lovells US, LLP, Respondent