No. 20-1007

Merrilee Stewart v. RRL Holding Company of Ohio, LLC, et al.

Lower Court: Ohio
Docketed: 2021-01-27
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: antitrust civil-rights-act constitutional-rights due-process equal-employment-opportunity equal-protection fair-housing-act federal-law-enforcement federal-laws state-court-procedure whistleblower whistleblower-protection
Key Terms:
Arbitration SocialSecurity DueProcess HabeasCorpus Securities
Latest Conference: 2021-05-20 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Are the Courts of the State of Ohio obligated to enforce Federal Laws?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

questions presented for review 1. Are the Courts of the State of Ohio obligated to enforce Federal Laws? a. Whistleblower Laws designed to protect the crime victim and informants. b. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Right to Sue c. The Civil Rights Act, The Fair Housing Act, Sherman and Clayton Act 2. Can the lower court in Ohio ignore and disobey an order from the higher Appeals Court? This lower court denied the Appeals court order for a hearing and this disobedience of the lower court infringes upon Petitioners constitutional rights protected by the First, Seventh and Fourteenth Amendments. 3. Does a citizen of Ohio have the same Duty to Report White-Collar crimes and is that citizen offered ; the same protections for reporting as are afforded citizens of other states who are offered protected under the constitution and federal laws. a. Should a resident of the State of Ohio and a United States citizen, be afforded the same equal constitutional protections and due process rights as are granted to a non-resident in the Courts of the State of Ohio? 4. Can a Court of the State of Ohio inflict a lifetime sentence upon a citizen, offer no opportunity to be heard, offer no right to appeal, and subsequently lock the doors and throw away the keys for all eternity on this and all-future access to the courts? a. A citizens Duty to Report White-Collar crimes is not Vexatious Litigation. b. The Unconstitutional application of Vexatious litigator statute for retaliation against Petitioner for fulling her Duty to report White-Collar crimes in in violation of Whistleblower laws. c. The statute, as applied stripes Petitioner of Free Speech, Equal Access and Due Process of Law (First, Seventh and Fourteenth Amendments) d. Would this be subject to collateral review or Writ of Habeas Corpus? 5. How long can a Common Pleas Judge in Ohio keep a case in Stayed Status and under a preliminary Agreed Entry before it violates the Petitioner Equal Access, Due Process, Free Speech and Federal Laws. Is not the right to sue and defend in the courts one of the highest and most essential privileges of citizenship and must be allowed by each state to the citizens of all other states? See Chambers v. Baltimore & O.R.R., 207 U.S. 142 (1907) See also McKnett v. St. Louis & S.F. Ry., 292 U.S. 230, 233 (1934). Note: The 2011 annual report of the Ohio Supreme Court, justices noted that only 2 percent of civil cases in the U.S. ever reach a jury. It reported the rate in Ohio was even less, about 1.3 percent, and that the rate in Ohio has decreased every year for the past decade. ' ii. f II.

Docket Entries

2021-05-24
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-05-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/20/2021.
2021-04-21
2021-03-29
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/26/2021.
2021-02-24
Waiver of right of respondent RRL Holding Company of Ohio, LLC, et al. to respond filed.
2021-01-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 26, 2021)

Attorneys

Merrilee Stewart
Merrilee Stewart — Petitioner
Merrilee Stewart — Petitioner
RRL Holding Company of Ohio, LLC, et al.
Matthew T. KempShumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP, Respondent
Matthew T. KempShumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP, Respondent