No. 20-1012

Charles Guenther v. Lockheed Martin Corporation, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-01-27
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: breach-of-duty concealment discovery-rule erisa fiduciary-duty fraud fraud-exception statute-of-limitations uniformity-of-decision
Key Terms:
Arbitration ERISA
Latest Conference: 2021-04-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the fraud and concealment exception in 29 U.S.C. § 1113 applies when the underlying breach of fiduciary duty consists of fraud or concealment, or if there must be additional fraud or concealment after the underlying breach to trigger the longer six-year statute of limitations

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED The ERISA statute of limitations, 29 U.S.C. § 1118, provides that an action for breach of fiduciary duty must ordinarily be brought “three years after the earliest date on which the plaintiff had actual knowledge of the breach or violation; except that in the case of fraud or concealment, such action may be commenced not later than six years after the date of discovery of such breach or violation.” The following question is raised with this case: (1) Is the fraud and concealment exception in 29 U.S.C. § 1113 applicable when the underlying breach of fiduciary duty consists of fraud or concealment, or does there have to be additional fraud or concealment after the underlying breach of fiduciary duty to trigger the longer six year statute of limitations? i

Docket Entries

2021-05-03
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-23
Reply of petitioner Charles Guenther filed. (Distributed)
2021-04-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/30/2021.
2021-03-29
Brief of respondents Lockheed Martin Corporation, et al. in opposition filed.
2021-02-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 29, 2021.
2021-02-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 26, 2021 to March 29, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-01-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 26, 2021)

Attorneys

Charles Guenther
Andrew Field PiercePierce & Shearer LLP, Petitioner
Andrew Field PiercePierce & Shearer LLP, Petitioner
Lockheed Martin Corporation, et al.
Nicole A. SaharskyMayer Brown LLP, Respondent
Nicole A. SaharskyMayer Brown LLP, Respondent