No. 20-1015

Alexi Ortiz v. Alfred D. Walsh, Jr.

Lower Court: Maryland
Docketed: 2021-01-28
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: civil-procedure constitutional-claims due-process fourteenth-amendment judicial-review property-rights standing tax-sale
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2021-04-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the State court's reliance on Quillens v. Moore (requiring an individual to pay taxes, interest, and tax sale purchaser costs prior to any court review) violate a property owner's Fourteenth Amendment due process rights where the enforcement of the condition precedent without a mechanism for compliance created a de facto bar to review of Petitioner's constitutional claims?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED: Did the State court’s reliance on Quillens v. Moore (requiring an individual to pay taxes, interest, and tax sale purchaser costs prior to any court review) violate a property owner's Fourteenth Amendment due process rights where the enforcement of the condition precedent without a mechanism for compliance created a de facto bar to review of Petitioner’s constitutional claims? 2

Docket Entries

2021-04-05
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2021.
2021-01-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 1, 2021)

Attorneys

Alexi Ortiz
William L. Callahan Jr.William L. Callahan,P.A., Petitioner
William L. Callahan Jr.William L. Callahan,P.A., Petitioner