No. 20-1017
Lawrence Johnson v. United States
Relisted (2)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: 2nd-amendment affirmative-defense circuit-split civil-rights common-law criminal-law criminal-statute due-process firearm-possession law-enforcement statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-06-17
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether innocent transitory possession is an affirmative defense to illegal possession of a firearm under 18 U.S.C. 922(g)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
question presented—over which there is a persistent and openly recognized split among the federal circuits—is whether innocent transitory possession is an affirmative defense to illegal possession of a firearm under 18 U.S.C. 922(g). The second question presented—which arises only if the Court denies review of the first question— is whether the Court should hold this case pending decisions on the merits in United States v. Gary, No. 20444 (cert. granted Jan. 8, 2021) and Greer v. United States, No. 19-8709 (cert. granted Jan. 8, 2021).
Docket Entries
2021-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
2021-04-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/30/2021.
2021-03-31
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2021-02-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 31, 2021.
2021-02-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 1, 2021 to March 31, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-01-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 1, 2021)
Attorneys
Lawrence Johnson
Michael B. Kimberly — MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY, Petitioner
Michael B. Kimberly — MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent