Was Coulter denied Due Process because of Bias?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Was Coulter denied Due Process because of Bias? 2. Is Pervasive Bias responsible for the denial of Due Process to Coulter and others? 2. Is the new Massachusetts Police Accountability (POST) Commission destined to fail unless the commission assures that the majority of its members are from outside of the “Justice System”? i. b. ‘PARTIES IN THE COURT BELOW ; Petitioner + “Jean'Coulter — , "Respondents >. Jamsan’Hotel Management, Inc., . Amisha IL L.L.C., Amisha L.L.C, Aryan Hospitality LIL.C, Kenneth J Biagioni, Hartwell Hospitality . o ‘L:L.C; Jamsan Investments L.L.C, MEERA LLC, Ashok Patel, Dilip Patel, Hitest Patel, MEERA . \Hospitality LLC, Kamlesh’ Patel, Navin Patel, Nikul , Patel, Rajeshkumar Patél,-PAYAL Hotel LLC, ‘ +. CRONIT. Hospitality II LLC, Rushil Hospitality LLC, c Ayushi L.L.C, Jafiies Berry, Choice Hotels, John Doe, : mat + John Doe; JZANVI‘Hosgpitality LLC, JHM Fortune >a LLG, JHM Phase II LLC, JHM Village LLC, : Lexington Mexican Restaurant Group Inc, Lexington : } Police Departineint; Lexington Police Office-Evelyn, j | Lexingtoh Police Officer-Papia, MEENA Investments i , LLC, Michael G Milazzo, Archit Patel, Hitest Patel, 7 | . +Kamleshkumar Patel, Pélice‘Lieuténant Mazerall, : Quality Inn &'Suites, SHIVPAR Inc., : | : Unknown Lexington Police Meme Officer er i eto ith fea Tha : ta". NI> PROCEEDINGS.IN THE LOWER COURTS : Massachusetts Superior Court ; fis 01s rGase.No: 1681CV02632 “= Coulter, Jean | » wa" 1} Jaméan' Hotel Management Inc..et. al. 05/22/2018 Fital'JG@dgment. “Fails to state a claim” re wads thereat. ; tae eam woman 7 , : ; i | 11. Massachusetts Chapter 140, Section 7 33a. 12. Massachusetts Chapter 140, Section 12C 34a. 13. Massachusetts Chapter 266, Section 17 -35a. 14. Massachusetts Chapter 223, Section 18 36a. 15. Motion and Memorandum Change of 37a. Venue 16. Fourth Amended Complaint 43a. 17. Request for Further Appellate Review70a. Raising Pervasive bias (portions) 18. Police Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss in 75a. the federal court 19. Complaint for Civil Action in the U.S. 87a. District Court 19. Contracts Confirmation of Reservation 101a. , 20. Letter by Defendant Biagioni 118a. 21. Hand-written Order “denies” written 118a. (dated 6/19/18) 22. Motion to Amend the Findings in the 119a. U.S. District Court 23. Motion for Reconsideration 125a. 24. Motion for Recusal 181a. . TABLE OF CITATIONS Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 US 662 Supreme 19., 21. : Court 2009 Bose Corp. v. Ejaz, 732 F. 3d 17 Court of 18., 14. Appeals, 1st Circuit 2013 Bosque v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA, 762 F. 10. Supp. 2d 342 Dist. Court, D. Massachusetts 2011 Chamberlain v. Chandler, C.C. D.Mass., 5 13. Fed.Cas. p. 413, No. 2575 v. Crawford v. Hotel Essex Boston Corporation, 13. 143 F. Supp. 172 Dist. Court, D. Massachusetts 1956 Frewen v. Page, 238 Mass. 499, 503, 131 12., 13. N.E. 475, 476, 17 A.L.R. 134 Marino v. Hyatt Corp., 793 F. 2d 427 Court 13. of Appeals, 1st Circuit 1986 Vadnais v. NSK Steering Sys. Am., Inc., 675 11. F.Supp.2d 205, 207 (D.Mass.2009) Weiler v. PortfolioScope, Inc. 12 N.E.3d 354, 361 14. (Mass. 2014) vt. d. _ REPORTS OF OPINIONS AND ORDERS _ The decision of the Appeals Court of Massachusetts is recorded at 97 Mass. App. Ct. 1124 (2020) (Case No. 19-P-951 in the state appeals court), only states : “June 12, 2020. Judgment affirmed. Orders denying motions to amend the findings and for change of venue affirmed.” The state’s highest court, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, denied review however, so there is no report of that decision. e. JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT. : All of the matters under consideration at this time were denied review in the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court on August 5, 2020. Jurisdiction in this Honorable Court is pursuant to: 28 U.S. Code § 1257State courts; certiorari (a) Final judgments or decrees rendered by the highest court of a State in which a decision could be had, may be reviewed by the Supreme Court by writ of certiorari where the validity o