Is Pa. R.C.P. Rule 233.1 Unconstitutional?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED : 1. a.Is Pa. R.C.P. Rule 233.1 Unconstitutional? b. Is Pa. R.C.P. Rule 233.1 Unconstitutionally Vague? ; 3. Were Coulter’s Due Process Rights violated? 4. Has pervasive bias (favoring “Justice System” defendants) resulted in the violation of Due Process in the Pennsylvania courts system-wide? i. b. PARTIES IN THE LOWER COURT Petitioner Jean Coulter Respondents Philip A. Ignelzi, Timothy P. O’Reilly, Ronald W. Folino, Tony Bagnato, : Jamie L. Lenzi, Cipriani & Werner and David N. Wecht ; LIST OF PROCEEDINGS Trial Court Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas No. GD-15-02176 Coulter vs. Bagnato et. al. Judgment Order filed December 17, 2015.! (The Order Striking/Opening Default Judgment, was filed February 17, 2016 is the last order by the Trial Court — and why Coulter’s requested Mandamus.) Appellate Court — Petition for Mandamus Supreme Court of Pennsylvania — Western District No. 59 WM 2020 Coulter, J., Pet. v. Tony Bagnato, et al. Denial of Mandamus July 31, 2020 ; 1 This Order is interlocutory because of an existing Default Judgment against four (4) of the Defendants (filed on August 5, 2015), which, apparently the judge was unaware of. c.