No. 20-1024

Geoffrey M. Young v. Adam Edelen, et al.

Lower Court: Kentucky
Docketed: 2021-01-28
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: appellate-procedure civil-complaint civil-procedure civil-rights due-process pro-se-litigation rule-11-sanctions rule-12-dismissal sanctions standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2021-04-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

whether-trial-court-construed-complaint-favorably

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1) Ifa trial court never construes the : ; allegations in a civil complaint favorably to the plaintiff or never construes them at all, are all of its oe Civil Rule (CR) 12.02(f) dismissal orders and CR 11 ; / sanctioning orders against the plaintiff nullities? 2) May the Supreme Court of Kentucky order : an appellant to file a brief, decide the appeal before . the brief is filed, call the appellant's timely-filed brief a “miscellaneous correspondence styled as a brief,” to ignore the appellant's timely-filed response to the | > Court's show cause order, and sanction the appellant on the grounds that he never showed cause why he should not be sanctioned?

Docket Entries

2021-04-05
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2021.
2020-12-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 1, 2021)

Attorneys

Geoffrey M. Young
Geoffrey M. Young — Petitioner
Geoffrey M. Young — Petitioner