No. 20-1043

United States v. Miguel Angel Cano

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-01-29
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Relisted (2) Experienced Counsel
Tags: border-crime border-related-crimes border-search digital-contraband digital-evidence electronic-device fourth-amendment physical-smuggling warrant-exception
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Arbitration FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Immigration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2021-06-24 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in concluding that the scope of a search of an electronic device under the border-search exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement is limited solely to digital contraband on the device itself, and cannot include evidence of physical smuggling or other border-related crimes

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in concluding that the scope of a search of an electronic device under the border-search exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement is limited solely to digital contraband on the device itself, and cannot include evidence of physical smuggling or other border-related crimes. (I)

Docket Entries

2021-06-28
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
2021-06-28
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.
2021-06-15
Rescheduled.
2021-06-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
2021-06-01
Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)
2021-05-12
Brief of respondent Miguel Angel Cano in opposition filed.
2021-05-12
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Miguel Angel Cano.
2021-03-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 12, 2021.
2021-03-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 31, 2021 to May 12, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-02-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 31, 2021.
2021-02-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 1, 2021 to March 31, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-01-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 1, 2021)

Attorneys

Miguel Angel Cano
Harini P. RaghupathiFederal Defender of San Diego Inc., Respondent
Harini P. RaghupathiFederal Defender of San Diego Inc., Respondent
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Petitioner
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Petitioner