No. 20-1043
United States v. Miguel Angel Cano
Relisted (2)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: border-crime border-related-crimes border-search digital-contraband digital-evidence electronic-device fourth-amendment physical-smuggling warrant-exception
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Arbitration FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Immigration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw Arbitration FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Immigration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-06-24
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in concluding that the scope of a search of an electronic device under the border-search exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement is limited solely to digital contraband on the device itself, and cannot include evidence of physical smuggling or other border-related crimes
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in concluding that the scope of a search of an electronic device under the border-search exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement is limited solely to digital contraband on the device itself, and cannot include evidence of physical smuggling or other border-related crimes. (I)
Docket Entries
2021-06-28
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
2021-06-28
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.
2021-06-15
Rescheduled.
2021-06-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
2021-06-01
Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)
2021-05-12
Brief of respondent Miguel Angel Cano in opposition filed.
2021-05-12
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Miguel Angel Cano.
2021-03-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 12, 2021.
2021-03-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 31, 2021 to May 12, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-02-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 31, 2021.
2021-02-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 1, 2021 to March 31, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-01-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 1, 2021)
Attorneys
Miguel Angel Cano
Harini P. Raghupathi — Federal Defender of San Diego Inc., Respondent
Harini P. Raghupathi — Federal Defender of San Diego Inc., Respondent
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Petitioner
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Petitioner