No. 20-1045
David G. Liebenguth v. Connecticut
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process fighting-words first-amendment free-speech hate-speech law-enforcement racial-epithet
Latest Conference:
2021-02-19
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether Referring To A Law Enforcement Officer By A Racial Epithet While Protesting An Enforcement Action Constitutes Fighting Words Unprotected By The First Amendment.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Referring To A Law Enforcement Officer By A Racial Epithet While Protesting An Enforcement Action Constitutes Fighting Words Unprotected By The First Amendment
Docket Entries
2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-02-02
Waiver of right of respondent State of Connecticut to respond filed.
2021-01-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 3, 2021)
Attorneys
David G. Liebenguth
Norman A. Pattis — Pattis & Smith, LLC, Petitioner
State of Connecticut