No. 20-105
John J. Davis, et al. v. Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
Relisted (3)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: administrative-law administrative-law-judge appointments-clause disability-benefits exhaustion-doctrine exhaustion-of-remedies judicial-review social-security
Key Terms:
Arbitration SocialSecurity ERISA Securities
Arbitration SocialSecurity ERISA Securities
Latest Conference:
2020-11-06
(distributed 3 times)
Related Cases:
19-1442
(Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a claimant seeking disability benefits or supplemental security income under the Social Security Act must exhaust an Appointments Clause challenge with the administrative law judge whose appointment the claimant is challenging in order to obtain judicial review of that challenge
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a claimant seeking disability benefits or supplemental security income under the Social Security Act must exhaust an Appointments Clause challenge with the administrative law judge whose appointment the claimant is challenging in order to obtain judicial review of that challenge. (I)
Docket Entries
2021-07-26
Record returned to the U.S.C.A. 8th Circuit. (1-Box)
2021-05-24
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
2021-02-01
Record received from the U.S.C.A. 8th Circuit. (1-Box)
2021-01-25
Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 8th Circuit.
2021-01-14
CIRCULATED
2020-11-09
As Rule 34.6 provides, “If the Court schedules briefing and oral argument in a case that was governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c) or Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 49.1(c), the parties shall submit electronic versions of all prior and subsequent filings with this Court in the case, subject to [applicable] redaction rules.” Subsequent party and amicus filings in the case should now be submitted through the Court’s electronic filing system, with any necessary redactions.
2020-11-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020.
2020-10-14
Reply of petitioners John Davis, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2020-10-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.
2020-10-07
Rescheduled.
2020-10-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.
2020-09-29
Brief of respondent Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security filed.
2020-08-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 29, 2020.
2020-08-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 31, 2020 to September 29, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-07-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 31, 2020)
2020-07-29
Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.
Attorneys
John Davis, et al.
Saul, Andrew
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent