Vipula D. Valambhia, et al. v. United Republic of Tanzania, et al.
SocialSecurity Immigration
Whether clause 3 of the commercial activities exception to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), 28 U.S.C. § 1605(a)(2), provides for jurisdiction in a suit to recognize foreign commercial judgments causing direct effects in the United States including payments to U.S. citizens in U.S. dollars using a U.S. bank account
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether clause 3 of the commercial activities exception to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), 28 U.S.C. § 1605(a)(2), provides for jurisdiction in a suit to recognize foreign commercial judgments causing direct effects in the United States including payments to U.S. citizens in U.S. dollars using a U.S. bank account. 2. Whether clause 2 of the commercial activities exception to the FSIA provides for jurisdiction in a suit to recognize foreign judgments based upon the foreign state’s payments in the United States in connection with its commercial activities elsewhere.