No. 20-1066
Ashlyn Hoggard v. Ron Rhodes, et al.
Tags: case-precedent circuit-split constitutional-rights factual-similarity first-amendment higher-standard legal-standard public-university qualified-immunity
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity FirstAmendment DueProcess FourthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
SocialSecurity FirstAmendment DueProcess FourthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-07-01
(distributed 8 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether qualified immunity shields public-university officials from liability
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether qualified immunity shields publicuniversity officials from liability when the reasoning—but not the holding—of a binding decision gave the officials fair warning they were violating the First Amendment. 2. What degree of factual similarity must exist between a prior case and the case under review to overcome qualified immunity in the First Amendment context? 3. Whether public-university officials should be held to a higher standard than police officers and other on-the-ground enforcement officials for purposes of qualified immunity.
Docket Entries
2021-07-02
Petition DENIED. Statement of Justice Thomas respecting the denial of certiorari. (Detached <a href = 'https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20-1066_ihdk.pdf'>Opinion</a>)
2021-07-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2021.
2021-06-23
Rescheduled.
2021-06-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.
2021-06-15
Rescheduled.
2021-06-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
2021-06-08
Rescheduled.
2021-06-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/10/2021.
2021-06-01
Rescheduled.
2021-06-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/3/2021.
2021-05-25
Rescheduled.
2021-05-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/27/2021.
2021-05-18
Rescheduled.
2021-05-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/20/2021.
2021-05-11
Rescheduled.
2021-04-27
Reply of petitioner Ashlyn Hoggard filed. (Distributed)
2021-04-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
2021-04-20
Motion to delay distribution of the petition for a writ certiorari until April 27, 2021 granted.
2021-04-15
Motion of petitioner to delay distribution of the petition for a writ of certiorari under Rule 15.5 from April 21, 2021 to April 27, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-04-07
Brief of respondents Ron Rhodes, et al. in opposition filed.
2021-03-12
Brief amici curiae of Young Americans for Liberty et al. filed.
2021-03-08
Brief amicus curiae of Speech First, Inc. filed.
2021-03-08
Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed.
2021-03-08
Brief amicus curiae of Center for American Liberty filed.
2021-03-08
Brief amicus curiae of Foundation for Individual Rights in Education filed.
2021-03-04
Brief amicus curiae of Southeastern Legal Foundation filed.
2021-03-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 7, 2021.
2021-03-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 8, 2021 to April 7, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-03-02
Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Ron Rhodes, et al.
2021-02-16
Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Ashlyn Hoggard.
2021-01-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 8, 2021)
Attorneys
Ashlyn Hoggard
John J. Bursch — Alliance Defending Freedom, Petitioner
Cato Institute
Jay Remington Schweikert — The Cato Institute, Amicus
Center for American Liberty
Mark P. Meuser — Dhillon Law Group, Amicus
Foundation for Individual Rights in Education
Ron Rhodes, et al.
Southeastern Legal Foundation
Speech First, Inc.
Young Americans for Liberty et al.
Frederick W. Claybrook Jr. — Claybrook, LLC, Amicus