No. 20-1066

Ashlyn Hoggard v. Ron Rhodes, et al.

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-02-04
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (6)Relisted (8) Experienced Counsel
Tags: case-precedent circuit-split constitutional-rights factual-similarity first-amendment higher-standard legal-standard public-university qualified-immunity
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity FirstAmendment DueProcess FourthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2021-07-01 (distributed 8 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether qualified immunity shields public-university officials from liability

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether qualified immunity shields publicuniversity officials from liability when the reasoning—but not the holding—of a binding decision gave the officials fair warning they were violating the First Amendment. 2. What degree of factual similarity must exist between a prior case and the case under review to overcome qualified immunity in the First Amendment context? 3. Whether public-university officials should be held to a higher standard than police officers and other on-the-ground enforcement officials for purposes of qualified immunity.

Docket Entries

2021-07-02
Petition DENIED. Statement of Justice Thomas respecting the denial of certiorari. (Detached <a href = 'https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20-1066_ihdk.pdf'>Opinion</a>)
2021-07-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2021.
2021-06-23
Rescheduled.
2021-06-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.
2021-06-15
Rescheduled.
2021-06-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
2021-06-08
Rescheduled.
2021-06-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/10/2021.
2021-06-01
Rescheduled.
2021-06-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/3/2021.
2021-05-25
Rescheduled.
2021-05-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/27/2021.
2021-05-18
Rescheduled.
2021-05-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/20/2021.
2021-05-11
Rescheduled.
2021-04-27
Reply of petitioner Ashlyn Hoggard filed. (Distributed)
2021-04-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
2021-04-20
Motion to delay distribution of the petition for a writ certiorari until April 27, 2021 granted.
2021-04-15
Motion of petitioner to delay distribution of the petition for a writ of certiorari under Rule 15.5 from April 21, 2021 to April 27, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-04-07
Brief of respondents Ron Rhodes, et al. in opposition filed.
2021-03-12
Brief amici curiae of Young Americans for Liberty et al. filed.
2021-03-08
Brief amicus curiae of Speech First, Inc. filed.
2021-03-08
Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed.
2021-03-08
Brief amicus curiae of Center for American Liberty filed.
2021-03-08
Brief amicus curiae of Foundation for Individual Rights in Education filed.
2021-03-04
Brief amicus curiae of Southeastern Legal Foundation filed.
2021-03-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 7, 2021.
2021-03-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 8, 2021 to April 7, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-03-02
Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Ron Rhodes, et al.
2021-02-16
Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Ashlyn Hoggard.
2021-01-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 8, 2021)

Attorneys

Ashlyn Hoggard
John J. BurschAlliance Defending Freedom, Petitioner
Cato Institute
Jay Remington SchweikertThe Cato Institute, Amicus
Center for American Liberty
Mark P. MeuserDhillon Law Group, Amicus
Foundation for Individual Rights in Education
Darpana M. ShethFoundation for Individual Rights in Education, Amicus
Ron Rhodes, et al.
David C. FrederickKellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C., Respondent
Southeastern Legal Foundation
Kimberly Stewart HermannSoutheastern Legal Foundation, Amicus
Speech First, Inc.
William Spencer ConsovoyConsovoy McCarthy PLLC, Amicus
Young Americans for Liberty et al.
Frederick W. Claybrook Jr.Claybrook, LLC, Amicus