Does 26 U.S.C. §7608 establish the relevant requisite authority of IRS agents?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1) Does 26 U.S.C. §7608 (Authority of internal revenue enforcement officers) establish the relevant requisite authority of IRS agents and did Special Agent Peter , Rae violate the scope of that authority as alleged? 2) Did the lower court(s), the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and the Department of Justice (DOJ) ignore the operation of 26 U.S.C. § 7608 in order to deprive the petitioner his Fourth and Fifth Amendment Rights as provided by the Constitution of the United States of : t America? 3) Did the United States District Court of the District of South Carolina (USDC) improperly remove the petitioner’s case from South Carolina Magistrate Court? : 4) Did the USDC and the United States Court of Appeals for the ; Fourth District (CA4) fail to provide the petitioner review as required by 5 U.S.C. § 706? . .. 5) Did the CA4 improperly impose sanctions on the Petitioner? 6) Did the USDC improperly dismiss the petitioner’s Motion to Reconsider citing Fed. R. Civ P. 59(e) as the sole basis? i RELATED CASES e Boggs v. Peter Rae, Civil Action No. 20190R4010501, Magistrate’s Court of Richland County, South Carolina. Removed to the United States District Court of S.C. on February 22, 2019. See