No. 20-1094

Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. v. United States, et al.

Lower Court: Federal Circuit
Docketed: 2021-02-10
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: administrative-agency administrative-law agency-determination civil-procedure due-process federal-circuit judicial-review methodology procedural-fairness retroactive-application retroactive-methodology
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Arbitration
Latest Conference: 2021-06-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Federal Circuit erred by affirming the practice that an administrative agency may penalize the subject of an agency determination for failure to conform with a methodology, after the agency has altered that methodology and applied it retroactively in making its determination

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Federal Circuit erred by affirming, in conflict with the D.C. Circuit, the practice that an administrative agency may penalize the subject of an agency determination for failure to conform with a methodology, after the agency has altered that methodology and applied it retroactively in making its determination.

Docket Entries

2021-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
2021-05-26
Reply of petitioner Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. filed.
2021-05-12
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2021-03-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 12, 2021.
2021-03-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 12, 2021 to May 12, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-02-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 12, 2021.
2021-02-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 12, 2021 to April 12, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-02-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 12, 2021)

Attorneys

Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd.
Lucius B. LauWhite & Case LLP, Petitioner
Lucius B. LauWhite & Case LLP, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent