No. 20-111
Walter N. Strand, III v. United States
Tags: administrative-law board-discretion civilian-oversight due-process judicial-review military-records separation-of-powers statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Takings Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw Takings Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-12-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Secretary of the Navy is 'acting through' the Board for Correction of Naval Records as required by statute when he reweighs evidence and sets aside a decision of that Board that was supported by substantial evidence
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
question presented is whether the Secretary of the Navy, is “acting through” the Board for Correction of Naval Records as required by statute when he reweighs evidence and sets aside a decision of that Board that was supported by substantial evidence. i
Docket Entries
2020-12-07
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-10-30
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2020-09-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including October 30, 2020.
2020-09-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 1, 2020 to October 30, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-08-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 2, 2020 to October 1, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-08-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 1, 2020.
2020-07-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 2, 2020)
Attorneys
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Walter N. Strand, III
Lucas Taylor Hanback — Rogers Joseph O'Donnell P.C., Petitioner
Lucas Taylor Hanback — Rogers Joseph O'Donnell P.C., Petitioner