No. 20-1132
DeMichael Tyrone Moore and Derrick Darnell Moore v. Tennessee
Tags: confrontation-clause constitutional-rights criminal-procedure cross-examination effective-cross-examination federal-law hearsay-exception memory-loss prior-recorded-statement witness-testimony
Latest Conference:
2021-04-23
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Confrontation Clause is violated by admitting a prior recorded statement of a witness who testifies he has no memory of making the statement or the underlying events, thereby denying a defendant the "opportunity for effective cross-examination."
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Confrontation Clause is violated by admitting a prior recorded statement of a witness who testifies he has no memory of making the statement or the underlying events, thereby denying a defendant the 'opportunity for effective cross-examination'
Docket Entries
2021-04-26
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/23/2021.
2021-02-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 22, 2021)
Attorneys
DeMichael Moore, et al.
Patrick Timothy McNally — McNally Law, Petitioner