Whether the Confrontation Clause is violated by admitting a prior recorded statement of a witness who testifies he has no memory of making the statement or the underlying events, thereby denying a defendant the 'opportunity for effective cross-examination'

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Confrontation Clause is violated by admitting a prior recorded statement of a witness who testifies he has no memory of making the statement or the underlying events, thereby denying a defendant the “opportunity for effective cross-examination.” i