No. 20-1136

Peter Capote v. Alabama

Lower Court: Alabama
Docketed: 2021-02-19
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: 6th-amendment aggravating-circumstances capital-punishment death-penalty judicial-fact-finding judicial-weighing jury-trial mitigating-circumstances sentencing-scheme sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment Copyright Privacy
Latest Conference: 2021-04-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Alabama death penalty sentencing scheme violates a defendant's Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Alabama death penalty sentencing scheme, which leaves it to the judge to find whether the aggravating circumstances outweigh the mitigating circumstances, a factual finding essential to capital punishment, violates a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial. 2. Whether this Court’s decision in McKinney v. Arizona, 140 8S. Ct. 702 (2020), applies when the result of a judicial “weighing process” (weighing aggravating circumstances against mitigating circumstances) increases a defendant’s potential punishment. i STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES Capote v. Alabama, CR-17-0963, Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama. Judgment entered January 10, 2020. An Application for Rehearing was overruled on May 22, 2020. Petition for Writ of Certiorari denied by Supreme Court of Alabama, #1190678, September 18, 2020. Alabama v. Capote, CC-16-340, Circuit Court of Colbert County, Alabama. Judgment entered May 24, 2018. Capote v. Alabama, CC-2016-340.60, Circuit Court of Colbert County, Alabama. (State habeas petition pending.) ii

Docket Entries

2021-04-19
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/16/2021.
2021-03-25
Reply of petitioner Peter Capote filed.
2021-03-15
Brief of respondent State of Alabama in opposition filed.
2021-02-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 22, 2021)

Attorneys

Peter Capote
Paul ShechtmanBracewell LLP, Petitioner
Paul ShechtmanBracewell LLP, Petitioner
State of Alabama
Richard Dearman AndersonOffice of the Attorney General, State of Alabama, Respondent
Richard Dearman AndersonOffice of the Attorney General, State of Alabama, Respondent