No. 20-1138
Cimznhca, LLC v. United States
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction circuit-court-review civil-procedure due-process federal-jurisdiction good-cause good-cause-analysis intervention motion-to-intervene non-final-order procedural-due-process standing
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity DueProcess Securities Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity DueProcess Securities Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-06-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals erroneously exercised jurisdiction over a non-final order
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals erroneously exercised jurisdiction over a non-final order by creating a motion to intervene when the Government specifically chose not to intervene as a party and never filed a motion to intervene; 2. Whether the Seventh Circuit erroneously applied and analyzed a good-cause analysis that was never argued or ruled upon in the district court; and 3. Whether the Seventh Circuit’s holding violates fundamental principles of procedural due process. i
Docket Entries
2021-06-28
Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2021-06-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.
2021-05-21
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2021-04-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 21, 2021.
2021-04-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 21, 2021 to May 21, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-03-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 21, 2021.
2021-03-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 22, 2021 to April 21, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-02-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 22, 2021)
Attorneys
Cimznhca, LLC
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent