No. 20-1141

Doe Company v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-02-22
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Relisted (2)
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction circuit-split civil-procedure civil-rights due-process perlman-doctrine personal-jurisdiction standing subpoena subpoena-enforcement third-party-disclosure
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities Patent
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether an appealing party's substantial interest in a disclosure order directing a disinterested third party to produce documents provides appellate jurisdiction under Perlman v. United States

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether an appealing party’s substantial interest in a disclosure order directing a disinterested ; third party to produce documents provides appellate jurisdiction under Perlman v. United States, 247 U.S. 7 (1918), where that interest will be lost absent immediate appellate review. 2. Whether a federal court lacks specific personal jurisdiction to enforce a subpoena that is directed to a foreign recipient and demands the production of doc‘uments that are unrelated to the recipient’s contacts with the United States. i

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED. Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2021-06-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-15
Reply of petitioner Doe Company filed. (Distributed)
2021-06-07
Motion to delay distribution of the petition for a writ certiorari until June 16, 2021 granted.
2021-06-04
Motion of petitioner to delay distribution of the petition for a writ of certiorari under Rule 15.5 from June 8, 2021 to June 16, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-05-25
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2021-04-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 25, 2021.
2021-04-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 26, 2021 to May 25, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-03-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 26, 2021.
2021-03-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 24, 2021 to April 26, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-02-22
Motion (20M57) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record Granted. Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
2021-02-03
MOTION (20M57) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-29
Motion (20M57) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record filed.
2021-01-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 24, 2021)

Attorneys

Doe Company
William M. JayGoodwin Procter LLP, Petitioner
United States
Brian H. FletcherActing Solicitor General, Respondent