No. 20-1148

Robert M. Sellers v. Denis R. McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs

Lower Court: Federal Circuit
Docketed: 2021-02-22
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (4) Experienced Counsel
Tags: civil-rights claim-scope disability-compensation due-process pro-veteran-canon service-records statutory-interpretation veterans-benefits
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity ERISA Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2021-06-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)

When a veteran has submitted an application for disability benefits, does the veteran's claim encompass all reasonably identifiable conditions within the veteran's service records?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED When a veteran initiates a claim for disability benefits, the Department of Veterans Affairs must determine whether the veteran’s impairment is causally connected to a disease or injury suffered during military service. When a veteran is ultimately awarded disability benefits, the award’s effective date depends on when the veteran initiated the claim. This case concerns the standard for determining which disabling conditions are within the scope of a veteran’s claim. The Federal Circuit held that, even where a veteran’s disabling condition is obvious on the face of the veteran’s service records, that condition is not within the claim’s scope unless the veteran’s claim form specifically identifies that condition by name or by symptomatology. This restriction on claim scope appears nowhere in the text of the governing statutes or regulations. The only place where the rule even arguably appears is on a VA form for veterans to fill out to initiate the claims process. Ignoring this Court’s repeated admonitions about the primacy of statutory text, the Federal Circuit gave legal effect to those instructions. In so doing, it allowed the language on an agency form to override a statute conferring benefits on a disabled veteran. The question presented is: When a veteran has submitted an application for disability benefits, does the veteran’s claim encompass all reasonably identifiable conditions within the veteran’s service records?

Docket Entries

2021-06-07
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/3/2021.
2021-05-17
Reply of petitioner Robert M. Sellers filed. (Distributed)
2021-04-28
Motion to delay distribution of the petition for a writ certiorari until May 18, 2021 granted.
2021-04-26
Motion of petitioner to delay distribution of the petition for a writ of certiorari under Rule 15.5 from May 11, 2021 to May 18, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-04-23
Brief of respondent Denis R. McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs in opposition filed.
2021-03-24
Brief amicus curiae of National Veterans Legal Services Program filed.
2021-03-24
Brief amicus curiae of National Organization of Veterans' Advocates, Inc. filed.
2021-03-23
Brief amicus curiae of National Law School Veterans Clinic Consortium filed. (3/25/2021)
2021-03-23
Brief amicus curiae of Military-Veterans Advocacy, Inc. filed.
2021-03-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 23, 2021.
2021-03-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 24, 2021 to April 23, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-02-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 24, 2021)

Attorneys

Denis R. McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Military-Veterans Advocacy, Inc.
Michael E. JoffreSterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C., Amicus
National Law School Veterans Clinic Consortium
Angela K. DrakeThe Veterans Clinic at the University of Missouri-Columbia School of Law, Amicus
National Organization of Veterans' Advocates, Inc.
Roman Martinez VLatham & Watkins, LLP, Amicus
National Veterans Legal Services Program
Teena-Ann Varghese SankoorikalCovington & Burling LLP, Amicus
Robert M. Sellers
Melanie Lynn BostwickOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Petitioner