No. 20-1150

Shelby L. Haynes, et al. v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund, et al.

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2021-02-22
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: agreement common-fund common-fund-rule equitable-lien erisa erisa-fiduciary fiduciary non-contractual-claims plan-administrator retroactive-application retroactivity
Key Terms:
Arbitration ERISA Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2021-04-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can an ERISA plan fiduciary assert equitable lien by agreement claims against persons with which it has no agreement?

Question Presented (from Petition)

Questions Presented For Review 1. Can an ERISA plan fiduciary assert equitable lien by agreement claims against persons with which it has no agreement? 2. Can the undisclosed conditions subsequent of an ERISA plan be applied retroactively against individuals with whom the ERISA plan administrator has no agreement? 3. Where a summary plan description omits an ERISA plan’s common fund-negating language, under what circumstances does the common fund rule operate? ii II. Corporate Affiliation Pursuant to Rule 29.6 of this Court’s Rules, petitioners state that they have no parent corporation(s) and no shareholders. No publicly held corporation owns any stock in any petitioner. iii

Docket Entries

2021-04-26
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/23/2021.
2020-12-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 24, 2021)

Attorneys

Shelby Haynes, et al.
John Alan YaklevichMoore & Yaklevich, Petitioner
John Alan YaklevichMoore & Yaklevich, Petitioner