No. 20-1154
Adan Torres-Nieves v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: 9th-circuit ambiguity ambiguity-resolution defendant defendant-rights government-breach legal-precedent plea-agreement precedent
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-03-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the 9th Circuit depart from precedent in failing to resolve ambiguity in favor of defendant in determining government breach of plea agreement?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Did the 9th Circuit significantly depart from its own precedent when it failed to resolve ambiguity in favor of the defendant in its determination of whether the government breached an admittedly ambiguous plea agreement?
Docket Entries
2021-03-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021.
2021-02-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Attorneys
Adan Torres-Nieves
Ezekiel E. Cortez — Law Offices of Ezekiel E. Cortez, Petitioner
Ezekiel E. Cortez — Law Offices of Ezekiel E. Cortez, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent