No. 20-1191

Robert Singletary v. Kenneth Nelsen, Warden, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-02-26
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: civil-rights compulsory-process due-process equal-protection jurisdiction rule-of-law
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-04-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Do the accused have a right to reside?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . : ; Sgt? A! Do the accused have Rights lewee 2 eside ! B. Should Turyhenr ALL Vem TT asaple Co the Congti ete” auariveed rapt Fo" pLova Us Th “D0 2 Co ‘ . . . “UT owAL Right LES Complusory Preces 4 oe voqect io rnd the Rule oF Sue process, Civ bbe, Equa’ Law under Your surisd eto:

Docket Entries

2021-04-05
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2021.
2021-03-04
Waiver of right of respondents Stephan, Warden, et al. to respond filed.
Main Document
2020-11-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 29, 2021)
PetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Kenneth Nelsen, Warden, et al.
Caroline Marie Scrantom — South Carolina Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Robert Singletary
Robert Singletary — Petitioner