Carline Maria Curry v. Douglas Mackenzie
Patent
Whether the plaintiff should have been awarded the amount prayed for in the initial complaint under Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 4 and Rule 54(C)
QUESTION PRESENTED . THIS IS A QUESTION OF CONSTITUTION CHALLENGE FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT The Ohio Supreme Court declined to accept ; Jurisdiction of the Appeal & a motion for a new Reconsideration or trial was denied the tenth District Court dismissed my case because they said the brief was . not submitted on time; the brief was submitted on time; and I resubmitted it once the clerk told me it wasn’t submitted. The court awarded me partial Liability of 11,671 when I actually spent 14,679.04 (the judge misunderstood what I told her the final balance was for the company to revive the patent.) ; The judgement entry was not according to law. Mr. . Mackenzie failed to plead and I should have been awarded the amount prayed for in the initial complaint which was 100,000,000 million doliars under Rule 4 B Process of Summons and Ohio Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 54 C. The question of constitution challenge is should plaintiff Curry had been awarded the amount prayed For in the initial complaint according to law under Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 4 Process of . Summons, and Rule 54 (C ) Demand. ‘ , ‘ 3 :