Is Exhibit G. Oklahoma Conversations a complete, consistent and coherent model of the facts of this case? Were those facts already cognizable to this Court and to federal law enforcement de jure? de facto?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED ; ; 4. The questions posed in the preceding course of appellate actions should be regarded as if entered here in their entirety.} / 2. Is Exhibit G. Oklahoma Conversations a complete, consistent and coherent ; model of the facts of this case? Were those facts already cognizable to this Court and to federal law enforcement de jure? de facto? . 3. Do the Service history as well as the content of 11-07-16 Motion for Custody and Relief demonstrate a “legitimate purpose” per 22 OS. §60? 4, Were U.S. Constitution Article IV Section I and Amendment I adequately raised before both the trial and appellate courts between 11-07-16 and 11-07-20? 5. Were my words and deeds those of a malicious and dangerous, ex-spouse? Or those of the proudest “Sooner” parent protecting my beloved nifias perdidas? ; 6. Does a search of the Linearized Root Data for “Hispanic” or “Mexican” reveal any elements of race or gender profiling in this case? ; 7. Did the conviction and removal of Judge Kendra Coleman for “oppression in office” prejudice the final disposition of this case? ; 1 See attached Exhibit H. Questions orAzogiaa LISTS OF PARTIES AND