No. 20-1222

Julie Dalessio v. University of Washington, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-03-03
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: 42-usc-1983 ada americans-with-disabilities-act civil-rights comprehensive-remedial-scheme due-process judicial-review ninth-circuit remedial-scheme section-1983 statutory-interpretation statutory-rights
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess Privacy HealthPrivacy
Latest Conference: 2021-04-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does a comprehensive remedial scheme for the enforcement of a statutory right under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) foreclose resort to a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim to vindicate the right?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Doesa “comprehensive remedial scheme for , the enforcement of a statutory right” under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) [42 : “ U.S.C. 12101 et seq.] foreclose resort to a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim to vindicate the right? / ii. ; 2. Did the Ninth circuit court of appeals so far , depart from the accepted and usual course of : _ judicial proceedings, or sanctioned such a departure by the district court, as to call for an exercise of this Court's supervisory ; power? iii.

Docket Entries

2021-04-05
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2021.
2021-03-12
Waiver of right of respondents University of Washington, et al. to respond filed.
2021-02-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 2, 2021)

Attorneys

Julie Dalessio
Julie Dalessio — Petitioner
Julie Dalessio — Petitioner
University of Washington, et al.
Jayne L. FreemanKeating, Bucklin & McCormack, Respondent
Jayne L. FreemanKeating, Bucklin & McCormack, Respondent