No. 20-1226

Tracy Will Vaughn v. Arkansas

Lower Court: Arkansas
Docketed: 2021-03-05
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: confrontation-clause constitutional-right-to-present-defense counseling-records due-process evidentiary-privilege privilege right-to-defense sexual-assault testimonial-development
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference: 2021-04-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a state may declare a sexual assault accuser's counseling records absolutely privileged even when the counseling is used to develop the accuser's testimony and the conceded basis for the charge

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether, consistent with the constitutional right to present a defense, a state may declare a sexual assault accuser's counseling records absolutely privileged even when the counseling is used to develop the accuser's testimony and the counseling is conceded by the prosecutor to be the basis for the development of the charge. i RELATED CASES State v. Vaughn, 73CR-18-151, Circuit Court of White County, Arkansas. Judgment entered on January 11, 2019. Vaughn v. State, CR-19-591. Arkansas Court of Appeals. Opinion issued on March 18, 2020. (

Docket Entries

2021-04-26
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/23/2021.
2021-04-05
Waiver of right of respondent State of Arkansas to respond filed.
2021-02-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 5, 2021)

Attorneys

State of Arkansas
Michael Anthony CantrellOffice of the Arkansas Attorney General, Respondent
Tracy Will Vaughn
Jeffrey Marx RosenzweigJeffrey M. Rosenzweig, Esq., Petitioner