No. 20-123

Jason Edward Rheinstein v. Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland

Lower Court: Maryland
Docketed: 2020-08-05
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: 14th-amendment 28-usc-1450 5th-amendment constitutional-rights discovery-requests due-process federal-court federal-removal-law procedural-due-process removal-law state-court
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether the lower courts misapplied important principles of federal removal law and erred in concluding there had been a failure of discovery in this case because by operation of federal law, pre-removal discovery requests, which have not yet become due, are nullified upon removal of a case from state court to federal court, since they (i) do not travel to the federal court, as they are not "proceedings" within the definition of 28 U.S.C. § 1450, and (ii) cannot remain in the state court either because removal of a case leaves nothing behind in the state court.

2. Whether the Maryland courts violated the Petitioner's due process rights, as guaranteed by the 5th and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, by denying him reasonable notice and opportunity to defend the "unalleged contentions."

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether pre-removal discovery requests are nullified upon removal to federal court

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-09-04
Waiver of right of respondent Attorney Grievance Commission of MD to respond filed.
2020-07-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 4, 2020)

Attorneys

Attorney Grievance Commission of MD
Michele Joan McDonaldOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent
Jason Edward Rheinstein
Jason Edward Rheinstein — Petitioner