No. 20-1230

In Re Reginald L. Sydnor

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2021-03-08
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-law-judge administrative-procedure administrative-procedures-act constitutional-appointment due-process lucia-v-sec mandamus merit-systems-protection-board standing united-states-constitution
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2021-04-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does petitioner's repeated timely requests for his appropriate ALJ due process hearing before a constitutionally appointed board ALJ, although all were ignored by the board and dismissed throughout the appeal courts, entitle petitioner to a timely request for that same appropriate due process relief, pursuant to this Court's ruling in Lucia

Question Presented (from Petition)

questions presented to this Court are as follows: 1. Does petitioner’s repeated timely requests for his appropriate ALJ due process hearing before a constitutionally appointed board ALJ, although all were ignored by the board and dismissed throughout the appeal courts, entitle petitioner to a timely request for that same appropriate due process relief, pursuant to this Court’s ruling in Lucia. 2. Does petitioner’s prior unsuccessful appeal of an unconstitutional, null and void board final decision now bar petitioner's entitlement to his appropriate constitutional due process relief, denied by that same unconstitutional board decision. 3. Can the district court rely upon the ruling of an unconstitutional, null and void board decision to deny . petitioner his appropriate constitutional due process relief, denied by that same board decision. 4, Does the lower courts’ dismissal of petitioner's mandamus request for his appropriate constitutional due process relief, denied by the board’s constitutional @ ® iii | appointment violation, in fact, sanctions the board’s | constitutional appointment violation against petitioner. , : :

Docket Entries

2021-04-19
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/16/2021.
2021-03-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-03-03
Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due April 7, 2021)

Attorneys

Reginald L. Sydnor
Reginald L. Sydnor — Petitioner
Reginald L. Sydnor — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent