No. 20-1239
Edward Smith v. Ohio
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: 14th-amendment 5th-amendment 6th-amendment amendment-protection constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection judicial-review legal-procedure state-court stealthy-encroachment
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment
DueProcess FourthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2021-06-17
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Supreme Court of Ohio violated the Petitioner's constitutional rights under the 5th, 6th, and 14th Amendments by refusing to enforce their protections
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED When the Supreme Court of Ohio "sidestepped," & refused to enforce the protection & privileges of the Sth, 6th, & 14th Amend. to the U.S. Constitution: "stealthy encroachment." The Court denied the Petitioner's Motion For Reconsideration Memorandum In Support, on December 29, 2020, Unpublished Opinion: State v. Smith, 2020 Ohio Lexis 2925,
Docket Entries
2021-06-21
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-06-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
2021-05-10
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-04-19
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/16/2021.
2021-03-22
Waiver of right of respondent Ohio to respond filed.
2021-02-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 7, 2021)
Attorneys
Ohio
Mary Stier — Hamilton County Prosecutor's Office, Respondent
Mary Stier — Hamilton County Prosecutor's Office, Respondent