No. 20-125
Iron Stone Real Estate Fund I, L.P., et al. v. Stephen Ratner, et al.
Tags: civil-procedure direct-action due-process judicial-dissolution limited-partner limited-partnership partnership-law party-rights procedural-due-process standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference:
2020-10-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the procedural due process rights of a limited partner are violated when that limited partner is not named as a party in a direct action
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the procedural due process rights of a limited partner are violated when that limited partner is not named as a party in a direct action brought by another limited partner in which judicial dissolution of the limited partnership is sought and subsequently ordered.
Docket Entries
2020-10-13
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
2020-09-01
Brief of respondents Stephen Ratner, et al. in opposition filed.
2020-07-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 4, 2020)
Attorneys
Iron Stone Real Estate Fund I, L.P., et al.
Brett Adam Berman — Fox Rothschild LLP, Petitioner
Brett Adam Berman — Fox Rothschild LLP, Petitioner
Stephen Ratner, et al.
Phillip David Berger — Berger Law Group, P.C., Respondent
Phillip David Berger — Berger Law Group, P.C., Respondent