No. 20-1259
Protect Our Parks, Inc., et al. v. City of Chicago, Illinois, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: article-iii-standing civil-procedure due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment lujan-standard standing takings takings-clause
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess Takings FifthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
SocialSecurity DueProcess Takings FifthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-04-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Plaintiffs possess Article III standing to bring their takings and due process claims
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED The questions presented are: 1. Whether the Plaintiffs possess Article III standing to bring their takings and due process claims in light of the Seventh Circuit’s application of Lujan v. National Wildlife Federation, 497 U.S. 871 (1990) and similar authorities of this Court? 2. If standing exists, whether the City of Chicago violated Plaintiffs’ Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights on their takings and due process claims? i
Docket Entries
2021-04-26
Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2021-04-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/23/2021.
2021-03-15
Waiver of right of respondent Chicago Park District to respond filed.
2021-03-11
Waiver of right of respondent City of Chicago to respond filed.
2021-03-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 12, 2021)
Attorneys
Chicago Park District
Joseph P. Roddy — Burke, Warren, MacKay & Serritella, P.C., Respondent
Protect Our Parks, Inc., et al.
Michael Rachlis — Rachlis Durham Duff and Adler.LLC, Petitioner
The City of Chicago
Benna Ruth Solomon — Corporation Counsel of the City of Chicago, Respondent