No. 20-1261

Wi-LAN, Inc., et al. v. Drew Hirshfeld, Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office

Lower Court: Federal Circuit
Docketed: 2021-03-11
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: administrative-law appointments-clause constitutional-law inferior-officer judicial-review patent patent-office principal-officer separation-of-powers statutory-interpretation uspto
Key Terms:
Patent Trademark Privacy
Latest Conference: 2021-06-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether administrative patent judges are principal or inferior officers under the Appointments Clause

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether, for purposes of the Appointments Clause, U.S. Const. Art. II, § 2, Cl. 2, administrative patent judges of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office are principal officers who must be appointed by the President with the Senate’s advice and consent, or “inferior Officers” whose appointment Congress has permissibly vested in a department head. 2. Whether, if administrative patent judges are principal officers, the court of appeals properly cured any Appointments Clause defect in the current statutory scheme prospectively by severing the application of 5 U.S.C. § 7513(a) to those judges. (i)

Docket Entries

2021-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
2021-05-25
Reply of petitioners Wi-LAN, Inc., et al. filed.
2021-05-12
Brief of respondent Drew Hirshfeld, Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office in opposition filed.
2021-03-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 12, 2021.
2021-03-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 12, 2021 to May 12, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-03-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 12, 2021)

Attorneys

Drew Hirshfeld, Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Wi-LAN, Inc., et al.
Douglas Ron WilsonArmond Wilson LLP, Petitioner