No. 20-1277
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-challenge criminal-procedure due-process excessive-fines forfeitability forfeiture kentucky kentucky-statutes timbs-precedent timbs-v-indiana
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-05-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Kentucky Court of Appeals decision in this case stand in direct contradiction to this Court's decision in Timbs v. Indiana, 139 S.Ct. 682 (2019)?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. DOES THE KENTUCKY COURT OF APPEALS DECISION IN THIS CASE STAND IN DIRECT CONTRADICTION TO THIS COURT'S DECISION IN TIMBS V. INDIANA, 139 S.Ct. 682 (2019)? Il DOES THE PRESUMPTION OF FORFEITABILITY FOUND IN KENTUCKY REVISED STATUTES (KRS) 218A VIOLATE THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE? ii List of All
Docket Entries
2021-05-17
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
Attorneys
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Jeanne Deborah Anderson — Office of the Commonwealth's Attorney, Respondent
Jeanne Deborah Anderson — Office of the Commonwealth's Attorney, Respondent
Richard Meyer
Joshua D. Farley — Farley & Associates, PLLC, Petitioner
Joshua D. Farley — Farley & Associates, PLLC, Petitioner