No. 20-1297

In Re Barbara Riley

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2021-03-18
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-order civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection equal-rights judicial-misconduct jurisdiction jurisdictional-challenge slavery
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference: 2021-05-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is it constitutional for officers of the courts to be creating, selling and buying facially null and void judge's personal orders entered/issued without jurisdiction daily nationwide for 231 years last and ongoing?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Is it constitutional for officers of the courts to be creating, selling and buying facially null and void judge’s personal orders entered/issued without jurisdiction daily nationwide for 231 years last and ongoing? U.S. District Court Clerk’s Administrative Order 440 Summons issued in a civil action. 2. Is it constitutional for officers of the court to play their own revised legal games in courts and out of courts with their own newly created judge’s personal rules/rulings daily nationwide for 231 years last and ongoing? U.S. v. Throckmorton; Norton v. Shelby County. 3. Is it constitutional for officers of the courts and armed-law enforcement officers to put badges and incidents of slavery back on black people and their children and families daily without jurisdiction nationwide for over nine , generations and ongoing? U.S. Constitution 13th Amendment. 4. Is it constitutional for officers of the courts and armed-law enforcement officers to overturn or to quash clearly established equal rights of black people and their children and families in courts and out of courts without jurisdiction daily nationwide for over nine generations and ongoing? Miranda v. Arizona

Docket Entries

2021-05-17
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
2021-04-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-03-09
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition filed. (Response due April 19, 2021)

Attorneys

Barbara Riley
Barbara Riley — Petitioner
Barbara Riley — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent