No. 20-1308
Roger D. White v. Super Gasoline, Inc., et al.
Response Waived
Tags: 6th-amendment constitutional-rights due-process fair-trial impartial-jury jury-selection racial-discrimination voir-dire
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment Securities
DueProcess FourthAmendment Securities
Latest Conference:
2021-04-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the trial court's actions in tainting the jury violate the defendant's right to a fair trial and an impartial jury?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented Where the trial court engages in tainting a jury (especially during voir dire) making it clearly pro-defense by punishing pro-plaintiff potential jurors and ; impanelling pro-defense potential jurors, also creates a non-diverse jury (all white and all women), and removes the only black member of the jury, does this violate Mr. White's guarateed right to a fair trial and and an impartial jury under the Due Process Clauses of the 5th, 6th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States?
Docket Entries
2021-05-03
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/30/2021.
2021-04-01
Waiver of right of respondent Super Gasoline, Inc., et al. to respond filed.
2021-03-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 19, 2021)
Attorneys
Super Gasoline, Inc., et al.
Sanford A. Friedman — Law Office of Sanford Friedman, LLC, Respondent
Sanford A. Friedman — Law Office of Sanford Friedman, LLC, Respondent