Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Secretary has permissibly included in a hospital's Medicare fraction all of the hospital's patient days of individuals who satisfy the requirements to be entitled to Medicare Part A benefits, regardless of whether Medicare paid the hospital for those particular days
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED The Medicare statute provides that a hospital that serves a “significantly disproportionate number of lowincome patients” may receive an additional payment for treating Medicare patients, known as the adjustment. 42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(5)(F)@(D and (ii). The statute directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to calculate a hospital’s adjustment (if any) using a formula that is based principally on the sum of two separate proxy measures of the proportion of low-income patients the hospital serves. The first proxy measure, known as the Medicare fraction, is the percentage of all patient days of individuals who were “entitled to benefits under [Medicare] part A” and who were also entitled to benefits. 42 U.S.C. 1395ww/(d)(5)(f )(vi)(1). The second proxy measure, known as the Medicaid fraction, is the percentage of all of a hospital’s patient days that are attributable to individuals who were eligible for Medicaid coverage but who were not entitled to Medicare Part A benefits. 42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(5)(f)(vi) ID. The question presented is as follows: Whether the Secretary has permissibly included in a hospital’s Medicare fraction all of the hospital’s patient days of individuals who satisfy the requirements to be entitled to Medicare Part A benefits, regardless of whether Medicare paid the hospital for those particular days. (I)
2022-06-24
Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Kagan, J., delivered the <a href = 'https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1312_j42l.pdf'>opinion</a> of the Court, in which Thomas, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Barrett, JJ., joined. Kavanaugh, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Roberts, C. J., and Alito and Gorsuch, JJ., joined.
2021-11-29
Argued. For petitioner: Jonathan C. Bond, Assistant to the Solicitor
General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Daniel J. Hettich, Washington, D. C.
2021-11-23
Letter regarding statistics in reply brief on the merits filed by petitioner. (Distributed)
2021-11-17
Reply of petitioner Becerra, Xavier, Secretary of Health and Human Services filed. (Distributed)
2021-10-25
Brief amici curiae of Certain Hospitals and Hospital Systems filed.
2021-10-25
Brief amicus curiae of The Federation of American Hospitals filed.
2021-10-18
Brief of respondent Empire Health Foundation, for Valley Hospital Medical Center filed.
2021-10-14
The record from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer.
2021-09-27
Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.
2021-09-20
SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, November 29, 2021.
2021-09-08
Brief amicus curiae of Americans for Prosperity Foundation in Support of Neither Party filed.
2021-09-01
Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)
2021-09-01
Brief of petitioner Becerra, Xavier, Secretary of Health and Human Services filed.
2021-07-21
Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including September 1, 2021. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including October 18, 2021.
2021-07-19
Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.
2021-07-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2021.
2021-06-08
Reply of petitioner Becerra, Xavier, Secretary of Health and Human Services filed. (Distributed)
2021-06-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.
2021-05-19
Brief of respondent Empire Health Foundation, for Valley Hospital Medical Center in opposition filed.
2021-03-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 19, 2021.
2021-03-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 19, 2021 to May 19, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-03-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 19, 2021)